In studying Environmental Science, learners develop their investigative, analytical and communication skills
Learners apply these skills to their understanding of ecology and environmental issues in order to engage in public debate, solve problems and make evidence-based decisions about contemporary environmental issues in society.
Environmental Science prepares learners for tertiary studies that include ecology and ecologically sustainable management.
Learners will:
Knowledge and understanding of science, scientific literacy and scientific method are necessary for learners to develop the skills to resolve questions about their natural and constructed world.
The wider benefits of this ‘scientific literacy’ are well established, including giving learners the capability to investigate the natural world and changes made to it through human activity. The ability to think and act in scientific ways helps build the broader suite of capabilities in learners as confident, self-motivated and active members of our society. It helps them to:
In studying Environmental Science, learners develop their investigative, analytical and communication skills. Learners apply these skills to their understanding of ecology and environmental issues in order to engage in public debate, solve problems and make evidence-based decisions about contemporary environmental issues in society.
On successful completion of this course, learners will be able to:
This course has a complexity level of 3.
At Level 3, the learner is expected to acquire a combination of theoretical and/or technical and factual knowledge and skills and use judgment when varying procedures to deal with unusual or unexpected aspects that may arise. Some skills in organising self and others are expected. Level 3 is a standard suitable to prepare learners for further study at tertiary level. VET competencies at this level are often those characteristic of an AQF Certificate III.
This course has a size value of 15.
Environmental Science complements some other TASC accredited senior secondary courses including: Agricultural Systems, Biology, Geography and Housing and Design.
The focus on natural ecosystems, how they change, and the ways humans impact on and manage them provides a rich context for learners concurrently or subsequently studying these other courses. For example, Environmental Science provides:
All content within this course is compulsory and will be studied within context of field and experimental work to provide a depth of understanding about the nature and application of ecology and how ecological systems are managed. Learners will create and utilise data and information wherever possible.
There is a mandatory extended Case Study that requires learners to apply the knowledge gained within the course to data they have collected and information they have researched.
In Environmental Science learners will develop a perspective on the interrelationship between ecosystems (criteria 5 and 6) and human society (criteria 7 and 8); a view that will allow them to develop an informed personal response to the environmental issues of today and tomorrow.
Learners will be drawn to their own relationship with the environment and the significance of the choices and decisions they make in their own lives.
Much of the course can be studied within the context of current environmental issues and topics highlighted in the media.
OVERVIEW
For the content areas of Environmental Science, the three (3) interrelated strands are:
building on learning in F-10 Australian Curriculum: Science.
In the practice of science, the three strands are closely integrated: the work of scientists reflects the nature and development of science; is built around scientific inquiry; and seeks to respond to and influence society.
Science Inquiry Skills and Science as a Human Endeavour strands (respectively):
must be integrated into the four interwoven threads of Science Understanding strand:
Each thread is compulsory; however the order of delivery is not prescribed.
Analysis, interpretation and drawing conclusions from data
Analysing and interpreting data is essential to every part of the course. Learners will be given practice in analysing, interpreting and drawing conclusions from environmental data presented in a variety of forms (for example, tables, graphs, models, illustrations and photographs). Familiarity with data will be integrated into the entire course and relate to all criteria aside from criteria 1 and 3. The data may be secondary or primary data generated from the learner’s own investigations. The case study provides an opportunity for the learners to present and analyse data. The ability to relate and critically evaluate data is fundamental to this course.
SCIENCE INQUIRY SKILLS
DEVELOP, INTERPRET AND ANALYSE EXPERIMENTS AND INVESTIGATIONS (CRITERION 2)
Key Knowledge and skills:
Experimental Design:
Learners will independently engage with the key stages of experimental design – measuring both biotic and abiotic variables.
The key stages for experimental design within Environmental Science are:
Biotic and Abiotic Surveys:
SCIENCE AS A HUMAN ENDEAVOUR
The strand of Science as a Human Endeavour is underpinned by two broad concepts:
ANALYSE THE APPLICATION AND IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ON SOCIETY (CRITERION 4)
Key Knowledge and Skills:
Key concepts to be considered are:
SCIENCE UNDERSTANDING
ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES (CRITERION 5)
This thread relates to the biological concepts and how ecosystems operate and function.
Key Concepts and Skills: Inputs and outputs of ecosystems
Matter and energy
Relationships between species
Populations
Key Knowledge and Skills:
The systems approach
ECOSYSTEM CHANGE (CRITERION 6)
This thread encompasses how ecosystems are changing due to natural events and/or human impacts on the systems.
Key Knowledge and Skills:
How natural cycles influence ecosystems:
Changes in climate
Consequences of changes in atmospheric gas composition
Introduced species
Biodiversity and its importance
HUMAN DEPENDENCE AND IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEMS (CRITERION 7)
Learners will consider how humans depend on the ecosystems and what impacts we have as a result of those dependencies. They will do this by
Key Knowledge and Skills:
Importance of ecosystem services
Ecological footprint
Concepts relating to pollution
Impact of resource use
* population growth is placing increased demands on the environment. The matrix below expands on these resources requirements and provides a summary of environmental impacts - including those pollution concepts listed above - that will be covered within this criterion.
Resource | Activity | Environmental impact |
Food | Agriculture |
* repeated chemical use can lead to resistance: for example: |
Aquaculture | * impact on benthic organisms underneath fish farm pens * decline in water quality * reliance on native baitfish to feed farmed fish. |
|
Fisheries | * reliance on individual species and technology change has led to overfishing. | |
Water | Sewage spills | * nutrient load can lead to eutrophication * pathogens causing disease * BOD from organic matter. |
Industrial spills | * BOD from organic matter (e.g. dairy effluent) * biomagnification of heavy metals. |
|
Increase in demand | * threat to environmental flow and ecosystem integrity * virtual water. |
|
Energy Production | Burning of fossil fuels and other emission production | * reliance on fossil fuels * production of greenhouse gases * acid rain * air pollution (e.g. photochemical smog) * ozone production in the troposphere causes environmental and human health problems. |
ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (CRITERION 8)
This thread provides experience with strategies for the sustainable use of resources within a development cycle and management strategies for environmental protection.
Key Knowledge and Skills:
Concept of commons
Ecologically sustainable development
Environmental management
Tools to manage the environment include:
Other strategies for management as well as the required management process (above) there are five other broad strategies that can be used:
Management of challenges to sustainability
PRACTICAL WORK
At least 30 hours will be spent on practical activities, including field trips, which are an integral part of the course, and are to be used as a means of teaching and consolidating the course content as well as a vehicle for assessment. The purpose of practicals throughout the year varies and includes:
On at least three occasions (excluding the case study) learners will be given the opportunity to address criterion 2 by following an experimental design process as outlined in the course content. On each of these occasions the learner will document:
o how data were used to draw a conclusion relative to the hypothesis
o sources of error and limitations of design
o possible improvements in design.
Examples of suitable practical activities to apply experimental design are:
CASE STUDY
Each learner must complete a case study that will represent more than 20 hours of design time. The case study will be assessed against a number of criteria with particular emphasis on the criteria not included in the external assessment (Criteria 1, 3 and 4). The study will contain some primary information and not be based solely on secondary knowledge.
Examples of primary information include:
o resource use
o impacts of resource use
o pollution produced
o impacts of pollution.
The study can be individual or a small group investigation. The topic will be chosen in consultation with the teacher, allowing flexibility in the choice of topic, the method of investigation and the format in which it is presented.
The case study presented must communicate the:
Criterion-based assessment is a form of outcomes assessment that identifies the extent of learner achievement at an appropriate end-point of study. Although assessment – as part of the learning program – is continuous, much of it is formative, and is done to help learners identify what they need to do to attain the maximum benefit from their study of the course. Therefore, assessment for summative reporting to TASC will focus on what both teacher and learner understand to reflect end-point achievement.
The standard of achievement each learner attains on each criterion is recorded as a rating ‘A’, ‘B’, or ‘C’, according to the outcomes specified in the standards section of the course.
A ‘t’ notation must be used where a learner demonstrates any achievement against a criterion less than the standard specified for the ‘C’ rating.
A ‘z’ notation is to be used where a learner provides no evidence of achievement at all. Providers offering this course must participate in quality assurance processes specified by TASC to ensure provider validity and comparability of standards across all awards. Further information on quality assurance processes, as well as on assessment, is on the TASC website: http://www.tasc.tas.gov.au
Internal assessment of all criteria will be made by the provider. Providers will report the learner’s rating for each criterion to TASC.
TASC will supervise the external assessment of designated criteria which will be indicated by an asterisk (*). The ratings obtained from the external assessments will be used in addition to internal ratings from the provider to determine the final award.
The following processes will be facilitated by TASC to ensure there is:
TASC gives course providers feedback about any systematic differences in the relationship of their internal and external assessments and, where appropriate, seeks further evidence through audit and requires corrective action in the future.
The external assessment for this course will comprise:
For further information see the current external assessment specifications and guidelines for this course available on the TASC website.
The assessment for Environmental Science Level 3 will be based on the degree to which a learner can:
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
selects and uses techniques and equipment safely, competently and methodically, applying them in unfamiliar contexts | selects and uses techniques and equipment safely, competently and methodically | uses familiar techniques and equipment safely and competently |
follows instructions accurately and methodically, adapting to new circumstances | follows instructions accurately and methodically to complete activities | follows instructions accurately to complete activities |
monitors and critically evaluates progress towards meeting goals and timelines, and plans realistic future actions | monitors and evaluates progress towards meeting goals and timelines, and plans/negotiates realistic future actions | monitors progress towards meeting goals and timelines and plans/negotiates future actions |
effectively utilises a wide range of strategies to meet planned timelines and address all requirements of the activity | utilises a wide range of strategies to meet planned timelines and address all requirements of the activity | utilises a range of strategies to meet planned timelines and address most requirements of the activity |
monitors and evaluates own contribution, and guides others, to successfully complete group activities. | monitors and analyses their contribution to the successful completion of group activities. | monitors and can explain their contribution to the successful completion of group activities. |
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
expresses a hypothesis to explain observations, as a precise and testable statement that can be supported or refuted by an experiment | expresses a hypothesis to explain observations, as a precise and testable statement | expresses a testable hypothesis to explain observations |
designs a controlled, safe and ethical experiment, identifying all variables and including all accepted elements of experimental design, to efficiently collect valid, reliable data | designs a controlled, safe and ethical experiment, identifying main variables, to collect valid and reliable data | designs a controlled experiment, identifying main variables and addressing safety and ethics, to collect valid data |
critically analyses and interprets data to draw a valid conclusion that relates to a hypothesis | analyses and interprets data to draw a valid conclusion that relates to a hypothesis | draws valid conclusions from data that relate to a hypothesis |
critically analyses limitations and sources of error in experimental design, with reference to evidence | analyses limitations and sources of error in experimental design | explains limitations and sources of error in experimental design |
critically analyses and evaluates experimental designs and provides evidence-based critiques and discussions on valid improvements and alternatives. | analyses and assesses experimental designs and describes possible valid improvements. | explains valid improvements in experimental designs. |
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
evaluates the reliability and appropriateness of information sources used | analyses the reliability and appropriateness of information sources used | explains the validity of information sources used |
collects a wide range of appropriate experimental data, and records it methodically for analysis | systematically collects and logically records relevant experimental data | collects and logically records relevant experimental data |
critically analyses concepts, communicating data and information using appropriate scientific formats and language | analyses concepts, clearly communicating data and information using appropriate scientific formats and language | explains concepts, clearly communicating data and information using correct scientific formats and language |
clearly differentiates the information, images, ideas and words of others from the learner’s own | clearly differentiates the information, images, ideas and words of others from the learner’s own | differentiates the information, images, ideas and words of others from the learner’s own |
referencing conventions and methodologies are followed with a high degree of accuracy | referencing conventions and methodologies are followed correctly | referencing conventions and methodologies are generally followed correctly |
creates appropriate, well structured reference lists/bibliographies. | creates appropriate, structured reference lists/bibliographies. | creates appropriate reference lists/bibliographies. |
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
evaluates relevance of identified science background to an issue | analyses relevant science background to an issue | explains the relevant science background to an issue |
evaluates significant components of an issue to present a detailed and balanced discussion, with reference to evidence | analyses and describes components of an issue to present a balanced discussion | identifies and explains key components of an issue |
clearly describes and critically evaluates tensions and connections between an issue and all significant relevant influences | clearly analyses the tensions and connections between an issue and key relevant influences | explains connections between an issue and relevant influences |
analyses and evaluates the benefits of the use of scientific knowledge, and any harmful or unintended consequences arising from this use | analyses benefits of the use of scientific knowledge, and any harmful or unintended consequences arising from this use | explains the benefits of the use of scientific knowledge, and any harmful or unintended consequences arising from this use |
evaluates relevant evidence and decision making processes to reach reasoned conclusions. | analyses relevant evidence to reach reasoned conclusions. | explains relevant evidence to reach reasoned conclusions. |
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
critically analyses complex interrelationships utilised in ecology | analyses interrelationships utilised in ecology | explains simple interrelationships utilised in ecology |
applies concepts to critically analyse complex ecological processes | applies concepts to analyse ecological processes | applies concepts to explain ecological processes |
identifies and evaluates complex problems and issues related to the study of ecological processes | identifies and analyses problems and issues related ecology | identifies and explains problems and issues related ecology |
makes evidence-based ecological predictions in complex familiar and unfamiliar contexts | makes evidence-based ecological predictions in familiar and simple, unfamiliar contexts | makes plausible, evidence-based ecological predictions |
selects, critically analyses interprets data with reference to ecological concepts, identifying any limitations, to reach evidence-based conclusions. | selects, analyses and interprets data with reference to ecological concepts to reach evidence-based conclusions. | explains data and ecological concepts to support valid conclusions. |
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
critically analyses complex changes to interrelationships when ecosystems are altered | analyses changes to interrelationships when ecosystems are altered | explains changes to interrelationships when ecosystems are altered |
critically analyses local and global changes to ecosystems | analyses local and global changes to ecosystems | explains local and global changes to ecosystems |
applies concepts to evaluate complex local and global ecosystem change | applies concepts to analyse local and global ecosystem change | applies concepts to explain local and global ecosystem change |
identifies and evaluates complex problems and issues related to ecosystem change | identifies and analyses problems and issues related to ecosystem change | identifies and explains problems and issues related to ecosystem change |
makes evidence-based predictions related to ecosystem change in complex familiar and unfamiliar contexts | makes evidence-based predictions related to ecosystem change in familiar and simple unfamiliar contexts | makes plausible predictions using evidence in familiar contexts related to ecosystem change |
selects, critically analyses and interprets data - identifying any limitations - to reach evidence-based conclusions related to ecosystem change. | selects, analyses and interprets data to reach evidence-based conclusions related to ecosystem change. | selects and explains data and concepts to reach valid conclusions related to ecosystem change. |
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
evaluates how humans depend on ecosystems | analyses how human depend on ecosystems | explains how humans depend on ecosystems |
evaluates how humans impact on ecosystems | analyses how humans impact on ecosystems | explains how humans impact on ecosystems |
applies concepts to evaluate complex local and global human dependence and impacts on ecosystems | applies concepts to analyse local and global human dependence and impacts on ecosystems | applies concepts to explain local and global human dependence and impacts on ecosystems |
identifies and evaluates complex problems related to how humans depend and impact on ecosystems | identifies and analyses problems and issues related to how humans depend and impact on ecosystems | identifies and explains problems and issues related to how humans depend and impact on ecosystems |
makes evidence-based predictions related to how humans depend and impact on ecosystems in complex familiar and unfamiliar contexts | makes evidence-based predictions related to how humans depend and impact on ecosystems in familiar and simple unfamiliar contexts | makes plausible predictions using evidence in familiar contexts related to how humans depend and impact on ecosystems |
selects, critically analyses and interprets data, identifying any limitations, to reach evidence-based conclusions related to how humans depend and impact on the ecosystems. | selects, analyses and interprets data to reach evidence-based conclusions related to how humans depend and impact on the ecosystems. | selects and explains data and concepts to reach valid conclusions related to how humans depend and impact on the ecosystems. |
This criterion is both internally and externally assessed.
The learner:
Rating A | Rating B | Rating C |
---|---|---|
evaluates strategies used for ecologically sustainable development | analyses strategies used for ecologically sustainable development | explains strategies used for ecologically sustainable development |
evaluates strategies used for ecologically sustainable management | analyses strategies for ecologically sustainable management | explains strategies for ecologically sustainable management |
evaluates complex challenges to environmental and economic sustainability | analyses challenges to environmental and economic sustainability | explains challenges to environmental and economical sustainability |
applies concepts to critically analyse and interpret complex ecologically sustainable management problems and solutions | applies concepts to analyse ecologically sustainable management problems and solutions | applies concepts to explain ecologically sustainable management problems and solutions |
makes evidence-based, ecologically sustainable management predictions in complex familiar and unfamiliar contexts | makes evidence-based, ecologically sustainable management predictions in familiar and simple unfamiliar contexts | makes plausible, ecologically sustainable management predictions using evidence in familiar contexts |
selects, critically analyses and interprets data, identifying any limitations, to reach evidence-based conclusions related to ecologically sustainable management. | selects, analyses and interprets data to reach evidence-based conclusions related to ecologically sustainable management. | selects and explains data and concepts to reach valid conclusions related to ecologically sustainable management. |
Environmental Science Level 3 (with the award of):
EXCEPTIONAL ACHIEVEMENT
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT
COMMENDABLE ACHIEVEMENT
SATISFACTORY ACHIEVEMENT
PRELIMINARY ACHIEVEMENT
The final award will be determined by the Office of Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification from 13 ratings (8 from the internal assessment, 5 from external assessment).
The minimum requirements for an award in Environmental Science Level 3, are as follows:
EXCEPTIONAL ACHIEVEMENT (EA)
11 ‘A’ ratings, 2 ‘B’ ratings (4 ‘A’ ratings, 1 ‘B’ rating from external assessment)
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT (HA)
5 ‘A’ ratings, 5 ‘B’ ratings, 3 ‘C’ ratings (2 ‘A’ ratings, 2 ‘B’ ratings, 1 ‘C’ rating from external assessment)
COMMENDABLE ACHIEVEMENT (CA)
7 ‘B’ ratings, 5 ‘C’ ratings (2 ‘B’ ratings, 2 ‘C’ ratings from external assessment)
SATISFACTORY ACHIEVEMENT (SA)
11 ‘C’ ratings (3 ‘C’ ratings from external assessment)
PRELIMINARY ACHIEVEMENT (PA)
6 ‘C’ ratings
A learner who otherwise achieves the ratings for a CA (Commendable Achievement) or SA (Satisfactory Achievement) award but who fails to show any evidence of achievement in one or more criteria (‘z’ notation) will be issued with a PA (Preliminary Achievement) award.
The Department of Education’s Curriculum Services will develop and regularly revise the curriculum. This evaluation will be informed by the experience of the course’s implementation, delivery and assessment. In addition, stakeholders may request Curriculum Services to review a particular aspect of an accredited course.
Requests for amendments to an accredited course will be forward by Curriculum Services to the Office of TASC for formal consideration.
Such requests for amendment will be considered in terms of the likely improvements to the outcomes for learners, possible consequences for delivery and assessment of the course, and alignment with Australian Curriculum materials.
A course is formally analysed prior to the expiry of its accreditation as part of the process to develop specifications to guide the development of any replacement course.
Examples in Context:
Examples in Context:
Examples in Context:
Examples in Context:
The accreditation period for this course has been renewed from 1 January 2022 until 31 December 2025.
During the accreditation period required amendments can be considered via established processes.
Should outcomes of the Years 9-12 Review process find this course unsuitable for inclusion in the Tasmanian senior secondary curriculum, its accreditation may be cancelled. Any such cancellation would not occur during an academic year.
Version 1 – Accredited on 13 August 2018 for use from1 January 2018. This course replaces ESS315114 Environmental Science and Society that expired on 31 December 2017.
Accreditation renewed on 22 November 2018 for the period 1 January 2019 until 31 December 2021.
Version 1.i - 17 December 2018. Minor refinements to Content.
Version 1.ii - Renewal of Accreditation on 14 July 2021 for the period 31 December 2021 until 31 December 2025, without amendments.
Accuracy: The extent to which a measurement result represents the quantity it purports to measure; an accurate measurement result includes an estimate of the true value and an estimate of the uncertainty.
Analyse: To examine, scrutinise, explore, review, consider in detail for the purpose of finding meaning or relationships, and identifying patterns, similarities and differences.
Assess: Determine the value, significance or extent of (something).
Communicates: Conveys knowledge and/or understandings to others.
Complex: Consisting of multiple interconnected parts or factors.
Critically analyse: Examine the component parts of an issue or information, for example identifying the premise of an argument and its plausibility, illogical reasoning or faulty conclusions.
Critically evaluate: Evaluation of an issue or information that includes considering important factors and available evidence in making critical judgements that can be justified.
Data: The plural of datum; the measurement of an attribute, for example, the volume of gas or the type of rubber. This does not necessarily mean a single measurement: it may be the result of averaging several repeated measurements. Data may be quantitative or qualitative and be from primary or secondary sources.
Demonstrate: Give a practical exhibition as an explanation.
Describe: Give an account of characteristics or features.
Design (verb): Plan and evaluate the construction of a product or process.
Evaluate: Provide a detailed examination and substantiated judgment concerning the merit, significance or value of something.
Evidence: In science, evidence is data that is considered reliable and valid, which can be used to support a particular idea, conclusion or decision. Evidence gives weight or value to data by considering its credibility, acceptance, bias, status, appropriateness and reasonableness.
Explain: Provide additional information that demonstrates understanding of reasoning and/or application.
Familiar: Previously encountered in prior learning activities.
Genre: The categories into which texts are grouped; genre distinguishes texts on the basis of their subject matter, form and structure (for example, scientific reports, field guides, explanations, procedures, biographies, media articles, persuasive texts, narratives).
Hypothesis: A tentative explanation for an observed phenomenon, expressed as a precise and unambiguous statement that can be supported or refuted by experiment.
Identify: Establish or indicate who or what someone or something is.
Investigation: A scientific process of answering a question, exploring an idea or solving a problem that requires activities such as planning a course of action, collecting data, interpreting data, reaching a conclusion and communicating these activities. Investigations can include observation, research, field work, laboratory experimentation and manipulation of simulations.
Justify: Show how an argument or conclusion is right or reasonable.
Law: A statement describing invariable relationships between phenomena in specified conditions, frequently expressed mathematically.
Mode: The various processes of communication – listening, speaking, reading/viewing and writing/creating.
Model: A representation that describes, simplifies, clarifies or provides an explanation of the workings, structure or relationships within an object, system or idea.
Primary data: Data collected directly by a person or group.
Reasoned argument/conclusion: one that is sound, well-grounded in evidence, considered and thought out.
Research: To locate, gather, record, attribute and analyse information in order to develop understanding.
Secondary data: Data collected by a person or group other than the person or group using the data.
Select: Choose in preference to another or others.
Solve: Work out a correct solution to a problem.
Synthesise: Combine elements (information/ideas/components) into a coherent whole.
System: A group of interacting objects, materials or processes that form an integrated whole. Systems can be open or closed.
Theory: A set of concepts, claims and/or laws that can be used to explain and predict a wide range of related observed or observable phenomena. Theories are typically founded on clearly identified assumptions, are testable, produce reproducible results and have explanatory power.
Understand: Perceive what is meant, grasp an idea, and to be thoroughly familiar with.
Unfamiliar: Not previously encountered in prior learning activities.
Validity: The extent to which tests measure what was intended; the extent to which data, inferences and actions produced from tests and other processes are accurate.
Learning Outcomes |
Criteria |
Criteria and Elements |
Content / Work Requirements |
plan activities, monitor and evaluate progress; use organisational strategies to complete activities and meet deadlines; contribute to completion of group activities in the context of environmental science and ecology |
1. apply personal skills to plan, undertake and complete activities |
Elements 3, 4 and 5 of standards |
Across all content and work requirements |
safely and competently use practical scientific techniques and equipment to collect data related to environmental science and ecology |
1. apply personal skills to plan, undertake and complete activities |
Elements 1, 2 and 5 of standards |
Across all practical work (see Work Requirements) |
use scientific inquiry to develop, conduct, interpret and evaluate experiments related to environmental science and ecology |
2. *develop, interpret and analyse experiments and investigations |
All elements of standards |
Experimental Design, Biotic and abiotic surveys, and analyse, interpret and draw conclusions from data |
apply discriminating research skills and apply the principles of academic integrity |
3. collect, record, process and communicate information |
Elements 1, 4, 5 and 6 of standards |
Across all content and work requirements |
communicate, predict and explain phenomena, using qualitative and quantitative representations in appropriate modes and genres, and following accepted conventions and terminology |
3. collect, record, process and communicate information |
Elements 1, 2, and 3 of standards |
Across all content and work requirements |
explain and discuss the personal, local and global interdependence of issues and responsibilities concerning social equity and environmental values |
4. analyse the application and impact of environmental science in society |
All elements of standards |
related to all content and case study (see work requirements) |
apply ecological concepts to describe and discuss processes; explaining how and why ecosystems change over time |
5. *describe and apply ecological concepts and processes |
All elements of standards for each criterion |
Ecological processes and Ecosystem change |
utilise environmental science and ecological concepts; describing humans as an integral part of the biosphere, locally and globally including their impact |
7. *describe and apply concepts relating to human dependence and impact on ecosystems |
Elements 1 , 2 and 3 of standards |
Importance of ecosystem services, ecological footprint, and concepts relating to pollution |
identify and discuss personal and community values that humans attach to natural resources, alternative uses for natural resources, and the implications of decision making |
7. *describe and apply concepts relating to human dependence and impact on ecosystems |
Elements 4, 5 and 6 of standards |
Impact of resource use |
analyse, interpret and critically assess environmental issues, utilising legislative and policy tools, to draw socially responsible conclusions |
8. *describe and apply principles and processes related to ecologically sustainable management of the environment. |
Elements 1 , 2 and 3 of standards |
Concept of commons, and ecologically sustainable development |
create positive economically and environmentally sustainable management solutions to issues |
8. *describe and apply principles and processes related to ecologically sustainable management of the environment. |
Elements 4, 5 and 6 of standards |
Development proposal process, other strategies for management, and management of challenges to sustainability |